history-egc.md (11225B)
1 # A timeline of esophageal cancer 2 3 <time id="post-date">2023-10-20</time> 4 5 <p id="post-excerpt"> 6 A couple of friends and I wrote a review article on the history of esophageal cancer. 7 The timeline was so interesting I thought I'd share it here, in a place where it can be easily found and updated. 8 </p> 9 10 I'll put a link to the article when it's published. 11 12 For now, 13 I'm not including any references, 14 and this is an abbreviated version. 15 I hope to fix both of these things in the future, 16 with the goal of a definitive, comprehensive list with a clear paper trail 17 (though a list such as this does require some curation - 18 I'm not interested in every small technical advance, 19 only major firsts and practice-changing updates). 20 21 As a side note, it would be cool if [HemOnc.org](hemonc.org) had 22 tables (*a* table? for comparative work?) 23 of all oncologic drug approvals, with dates and indications, 24 for every global approval agency. 25 Maybe with a link to the trial that led to each approval? 26 (It's not always 1:1 between trial:approval, 27 but would be nice to know for the majority of cases 28 where that pattern holds). 29 It's a huge task, 30 but would be so useful for clinicians, researchers, and investors. 31 I'm amazed nobody has done this yet, 32 though there are some partial lists that were helpful. 33 HemOnc does have a few wiki entries on dates of drug approvals, 34 but they're sparse. 35 (It's not an easy task, particularly for the Chinese approvals - 36 the only definitive source for the Chinese NMPA 37 appears to be a pdf that is in Chinese only. 38 If you read Chinese and would like to help, 39 please shoot me an email - see the contact link above) 40 41 If you are several steps ahead and beat me 42 to building the drug approval tables: 43 brava/bravo/brave/bravi, 44 please lmk 45 and I'll send you a string of happy, grateful emojis, 46 and we can talk about collaboration. 47 48 Likewise, 49 if you know of an important event in esophageal cancer history, 50 have a reference, 51 and think I should add it here, 52 please contact me. 53 54 ## Early History 55 56 <table> 57 <thead> 58 <tr> 59 <th colspan="3">Key events in the early history of esophageal cancer</th> 60 </tr> 61 </thead> 62 <tbody> 63 <tr> 64 <td>Date</td> 65 <td>Event</td> 66 <td>Notes</td> 67 </tr> 68 <tr> 69 <td>3000 BCE</td> 70 <td>First description of esophageal surgery, written in Egypt.</td> 71 <td>Smith Surgical Papyrus.</td> 72 </tr> 73 <tr> 74 <td>0 BCE</td> 75 <td>First description of EC, written in China.</td> 76 <td>Epidemiologic links to EC described between alcohol, hot drinks, and advanced age.</td> 77 </tr> 78 <tr> 79 <td>131-200</td> 80 <td>First descriptions of EC written in the West.</td> 81 <td>Dates are the life of Galen, Roman Greek physician who wrote extensively. Poor prognosis described.</td> 82 </tr> 83 <tr> 84 <td>1090 - 1162</td> 85 <td>First palliative methods for EC described, including esophagogastric feeding tubes.</td> 86 <td>Dates are the life of Ibn Zuhr, Arabian physician who described these methods.</td> 87 </tr> 88 <tr> 89 <td>1543</td> 90 <td>First detailed illustrations and descriptions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.</td> 91 <td>Vesalius, <i>De Humanis Corporis Fabrica</i></td> 92 </tr> 93 <tr> 94 <td>1690</td> 95 <td>First personal description of living with EC.</td> 96 <td>Diary of John Casaubon, English surgeon.</td> 97 </tr> 98 <tr> 99 <td>1770</td> 100 <td>First written Western hypothesis of the epidemiologic link between alcohol and EC.</td> 101 <td>Ernst Gottfried Gyser, <i>Medical inaugural dissertation on the fatal hunger, caused by callous narrowing of the esophagus, with phenomena worthy of attention which are detected in certain abdominal viscera.</i></td> 102 </tr> 103 <tr> 104 <td>1857</td> 105 <td>First described EC operation.</td> 106 <td>Albrecht Theodor von Middeldorph, Breslau surgeon.</td> 107 </tr> 108 <tr> 109 <td>1868</td> 110 <td>Esophagoscope invented.</td> 111 <td>Adolf Kussmaul, German surgeon.</td> 112 </tr> 113 <tr> 114 <td>1872</td> 115 <td>First known esophagectomy.</td> 116 <td>Christian Billroth, Austrian surgeon, with Vincenz Czerny assisting.</td> 117 </tr> 118 <tr> 119 <td>1877</td> 120 <td>First known cervical esophagectomy.</td> 121 <td>Vincenz Czerny. Post-operative survival of 15 months.</td> 122 </tr> 123 <tr> 124 <td>1913</td> 125 <td>First known curative EC resection.</td> 126 <td>Franz Torek, United States surgeon. Post-operative survival of 12 years.</td> 127 </tr> 128 <tr> 129 <td>1933</td> 130 <td>First report on a series of EC resections.</td> 131 <td>Tohru Oshawa, Japanese surgeon. 18 resections, 56% mortality.</td> 132 </tr> 133 <tr> 134 <td>1947</td> 135 <td>First large report on a series of EC resections in the West.</td> 136 <td>Richard Sweet, United States surgeon. 213 resections, 17% mortality, 8% 5-year survival.</td> 137 </tr> 138 <tr> 139 <td>1959</td> 140 <td>First report with <10% operative mortality</td> 141 <td>Komei Nakayama, Japanese surgeon. 953 resections, 5.8% mortality.</td> 142 </tr> 143 <tr> 144 <td>1981</td> 145 <td>First report with <5% operative mortality</td> 146 <td>Hiroshi Akiyama, Japanese surgeon. 210 resections, 1.4% mortality, 34.6% 5-year survival.</td> 147 </tr> 148 <tr> 149 <td colspan="3">Acronyms: BCE - Before Common Era. EC - Esophageal Cancer.</td> 150 </tr> 151 </tbody> 152 </table> 153 154 ## Key clinical trials and approvals 155 156 <table> 157 <thead> 158 <tr> 159 <th colspan="3">Key clinical trials and approvals</th> 160 </tr> 161 </thead> 162 <tbody> 163 <tr> 164 <td>1981</td> 165 <td>First neoadjuvant RT trial for EC</td> 166 <td>Launois et al. 40 Gy. Results were negative.</td> 167 </tr> 168 <tr> 169 <td>1984</td> 170 <td>First neoadjuvant CRT trial for EC</td> 171 <td>Leichman et al. 30 Gy, cisplatin. pCR 37%, operative mortality 27%, no survival benefit.</td> 172 </tr> 173 <tr> 174 <td>1988</td> 175 <td>First perioperative chemotherapy trial for EC</td> 176 <td>Roth et al. No benefit for cohort overall. mOS of responders 20mo, non-responders 6.2mo, surgery alone 8mo.</td> 177 </tr> 178 <tr> 179 <td>2002</td> 180 <td>First whole-cohort positive perioperative chemotherapy trial</td> 181 <td>Lancet, United Kingdom. Cisplatin+fluorouracil. mOS 16.8mo vs 13.3mo for surgery alone.</td> 182 </tr> 183 <tr> 184 <td>2010</td> 185 <td>Trastuzumab shown to have benefit for HER2+ GC and GEJC</td> 186 <td>ToGA trial. Trastuzumab+chemotherapy. mOS 13.8mo vs 11.1mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 187 </tr> 188 <tr> 189 <td>2012</td> 190 <td>CROSS trial first report</td> 191 <td>Van Hagen et al. 40 Gy, carboplatin+paclitaxel. mOS 49.4mo vs 24.0mo for surgery alone.</td> 192 </tr> 193 <tr> 194 <td>2017-09-22</td> 195 <td>First FDA approval for IO for EGC</td> 196 <td>KEYNOTE-059, pembrolizumab monotherapy, approved for 3rd line. Approval was later withdrawn as pembrolizumab moved to earlier lines.</td> 197 </tr> 198 <tr> 199 <td>2019-07-30</td> 200 <td>First FDA approval for 2nd line IO for EGC</td> 201 <td>KEYNOTE-181, pembrolizumab monotherapy. ESCC with CPS >=10. mOS 8.2mo vs 7.1mo for chemotherapy.</td> 202 </tr> 203 <tr> 204 <td>2020-06-10</td> 205 <td>First FDA approval for 2nd line IO for EGC, agnostic of CPS</td> 206 <td>ATTRACTION-3, nivolumab monotherapy. ESCC. mOS 10.9mo vs 8.4mo for chemotherapy.</td> 207 </tr> 208 <tr> 209 <td>2020-06-19</td> 210 <td>First NMPA approval for locally-produced IO, 2nd line camrelizumab for ESCC</td> 211 <td>ESCORT, camrelizumab monotherapy. ESCC. mOS 8.3mo vs 6.2mo for chemotherapy.</td> 212 </tr> 213 <tr> 214 <td>2021-01-15</td> 215 <td>First FDA approval for antibody drug conjugate in EGC</td> 216 <td>DESTINY-Gastric01, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki. EGC, AC, HER2+, 2nd line. mOS 12.5mo vs 8.4mo for chemotherapy.</td> 217 </tr> 218 <tr> 219 <td>2021-03-22</td> 220 <td>First FDA approval for 1st line IO for EGC</td> 221 <td>KEYNOTE-590, pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, EGC, AC and SCC, CPS agnostic. mOS 13.9mo (ESCC w CPS >=10) vs 8.8mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 222 </tr> 223 <tr> 224 <td>2021-04-16</td> 225 <td>Second FDA approval for 1st line IO for EGC</td> 226 <td>CheckMate 649, nivolumab with chemotherapy, similar setting to KEYNOTE-590. mOS 13.8 vs 11.1mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 227 </tr> 228 <tr> 229 <td>2021-05-05</td> 230 <td>First FDA approval for 1st line IO + chemotherapy + HER2-targeted therapy</td> 231 <td>KEYNOTE-811, pembrolizumab + trastuzumab + chemotherapy. ORR 74.4% vs 51.9% for trastuzumab + chemotherapy alone. CR 11.3% vs 3.1%, respectively.</td> 232 </tr> 233 <tr> 234 <td>2021-05-20</td> 235 <td>First FDA approval for adjuvant IO monotherapy</td> 236 <td>CheckMate 577, nivolumab after CROSS, EGC, AC and SCC, CPS agnostic. ESCC mDFS 29.7mo vs 11mo for placebo, EAC 19.4mo vs 11mo.</td> 237 </tr> 238 <tr> 239 <td>2021-12-10</td> 240 <td>NMPA approval for 1st line camrelizumab + chemotherapy for ESCC</td> 241 <td>ESCORT-1st, camrelizumab with chemotherapy. mOS 15.3mo vs 12.0mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 242 </tr> 243 <tr> 244 <td>2022-02-21</td> 245 <td>NMPA approval for 1st line tislelizumab monotherapy for GC and GEJC</td> 246 <td>Based on phase I/II studies.</td> 247 </tr> 248 <tr> 249 <td>2022-04-13</td> 250 <td>NMPA approval for 2nd line tislelizumab monotherapy for ESCC</td> 251 <td>RATIONALE-302, tislelizumab monotherapy vs chemotherapy, ESCC, PD-L1 agnostic. mOS 8.6mo vs 6.3mo for chemotherapy.</td> 252 </tr> 253 <tr> 254 <td>2022-05-19</td> 255 <td>NMPA approval for 1st line tislelizumab + chemotherapy for ESCC</td> 256 <td>RATIONALE-306, tislelizumab with chemotherapy, ESCC, PD-L1 agnostic. mOS 17.2mo vs 10.6mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 257 </tr> 258 <tr> 259 <td>2022-05-27</td> 260 <td>First FDA approval for 1st line dual IO</td> 261 <td>CheckMate 648, nivolumab with ipilimumab, ESCC, PD-L1 >=1%. mOS 13.2mo for IO + chemotherapy vs 12.8mo for IO + IO vs 10.7mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 262 </tr> 263 <tr> 264 <td>2022-06-20</td> 265 <td>NMPA approval for 1st line sintilimab + chemotherapy for GC and GEJC, agnostic of CPS.</td> 266 <td>ORIENT-16, sintilimab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy, AC. For CPS >= 5, mOS 19.2mo vs 12.9mo for chemotherapy alone. For unselected CPS, mOS 15.2mo vs 12.3mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 267 </tr> 268 <tr> 269 <td>2023-01-24</td> 270 <td>First OS data available for HER2 vaccine therapy</td> 271 <td>HERIZON study, HER-Vaxx (IMU-131)+chemotherapy, metastatic or advanced HER2+ GC and GEJC. mOS 13.9mo for vaccine+chemotherapy vs 8.3mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 272 </tr> 273 <tr> 274 <td>2023-02-24</td> 275 <td>NMPA approval for 1st line tislelizumab + chemotherapy for GC and GEJC.</td> 276 <td>RATIONALE-305, tislelizumab + chemotherapy vs chemotherapy, AC. For PD-L1 >=5%, mOS 17.2mo for IO + chemotherapy vs 12.6mo for chemotherapy alone.</td> 277 </tr> 278 <tr> 279 <td colspan="3">Acronyms and abbreviations: CPS - combined positive score. (C)RT - (chemo)radiotherapy. (E)AC - (esophageal) adenocarcinoma. EC - Esophageal Cancer. EGC - esophagogastric cancers. (E)SCC - (esophageal) squamous cell carcinoma. FDA - United States Food and Drug Administration.IO - immuno-oncologic therapy. pCR - pathologic complete response. PD-L1 - programmed death-ligand 1.mDFS - median disease-free survival. mo - month(s). mOS - median overall survival. NMPA - China’s National Medical Products Administration. ORR - overall response rate.</td> 280 </tr> 281 </tbody> 282 </table> 283 284 285